jump to navigation

Process-based models integrated with G.I.S. August 4, 2006

Posted by Georgios Xenakis in Personal.
trackback

s0199797.jpg

Hi,

My name is Georgios Xenakis and I am currently completing my Ph.D. with the University of Edinburgh. I am a forester and I hold a master degree in Resource Management by the University of Edinburgh. I got interested in Geographical Information Systems and Spatial analysis during my M.Sc. thesis. My first experience with G.I.S. was when I worked for the Forest Research Institute of Greece. There I saw for the first time the real application of G.I.S. in forest management. During my M.Sc. thesis I’ve try to introduce the “new” for me technology with more traditional forestry such as the predicting the sustainable yield based on yield tables. I’ve customised ArcView using Aveniue to introduce automated ways of predicting potential growth of Black Pine for Taygetos forest in Greece. With the application I was able to demonstrate the use of G.I.S. in forest management planning by providing maps of potential productivity and maps of the removable yield so as to ensure sustainability of resources.

However, the application was based on statistical empirical models, as yield tables normally are. The way of construction of yield tables and also their inability to introduce any possible environmental effects restrict their use, especially for a Geographic Information System framework. The solution to this is process-based modelling.

Process-based models are either detailed or simplified mathematical models, which are based on representation of basic physiological principals of tree growth. Photosynthesis, respiration, senescence and regeneration are some of the basic parts of the process that such models include utilizing differential equations. Introducing those into a G.I.S. framework and you have a management tool, which is capable for adaptation under different management scenarios.

However, such models have also their limitations. Differential equations could become extremely complex when a fine temporal scale is applied. Multiply by a fine spatial scale and you have such a huge calculation matrix that computer calculation capabilities are either impossible or extremely time consuming. When it comes into real fast and reliable solutions for forest management decisions then detailed process-based become prohibited. To overcome such model, ecological modellers developed simplified process-based models. Those models still include all the basic tree physiological principles but their differential equations are more simplified in their representation. This simplification comes either because the temporal scale is increased or because some basic physiological functions were simplified e.g. respiration.

I am using 3-PGN (Physiological Principles of Predicting Growth – Nitrogen), which is a simplified process-based model. Their routines include photosynthesis estimation based on quantum utilisation radiation efficiency, respiration based on a ratio between net and gross primary production and tree mortality. Unfortunately it does not include any regeneration routines however it includes a soil decomposition model, which provides estimates of soil carbon and nitrogen stocks together with an estimation of soil fertility based on nitrogen. Additionally the model is capable to provide estimates of stem, root and foliage biomass through allometric relationships and also an estimation of produced timber, mean annual increment, mean diameter and height, variables all valuable for forest management decisions.

The model was scripted into C++ and compiled. The integration of 3-PGN was done with a loose coupling technique, where model and G.I.S. software share common files but not the same interface. The C++ executable version shares float point grid files with ArcMap and ArcInfo. The model performs all simulations separately and results are produced in the same file format. Then transformation with the float grid routine of ArcMap and ArcInfo provide the spatial grids for representation and further analysis.

Although the version of the model without the soil decomposition models exists fully integrated with ArcMap, programmed with Visual Basic and is available by CSIRO Australia, the full ecosystem model 3-PGN is only available with this loose-coupled version.

I used the model to provide spatial patterns of potential Scots Pine productivity for Scotland. Based on a series of spatially generated environmental inputs such as maximum and minimum temperature, precipitation, incoming solar radiation and frost days the model gave a series of spatially explicit outputs such as potential mean annual volume increment, potential carbon accumulation, potential net ecosystem productivity, ecosystem respiration, carbon and nitrogen stocks and soil available nitrogen.

One part of my Ph.D. project is to provide a site classification based not only on capabilities of a site for potential timber production but also based on site capabilities for potential carbon sequestration. This way, forest managers would be able to provide forest planning based on different management objectives, which could include either timber production, recreation or even carbon sequestration.

G.I.S. provided me the tool to understand which is the combined effect of environmental and topographical effect with its advanced spatial capabilities. Spatial analysis performed on the spatial 3-PGN outputs include principal component analysis for reduction of the climatic input variables into a manageable number of variables, spatial autocorrelation analysis using Moran’s I statistic so as to explore how clustered or random are the produced by the model estimated patterns of carbon and timber production, regression analysis to identify which is the climatic or topographic inputs which spatial patterns match those of the produced timber production and carbon sequestration patterns and correlation analysis to explore thoroughly the most significant effects of climate and topography on patterns of potential timber and carbon productivity. Advanced mapping tools from G.I.S. helped me to produce high quality maps of all outputs of the model such as net ecosystem production, ecosystem respiration, soil carbon and nitrogen tools and also to provide the visual tool for producing potential timber production classes maps and carbon sequestration regions.

The results so far shows that Scots pine potential timber productivity is highly rationalised with almost circular regions of high productivity next to coastal areas leading to low productivity regions within the mountainous regions of Scotland. G.I.S. spatial analysis and map overlay showed that the less productive regions of Scots pine in Scotland is the western parts where precipitation and so potential productivity is larger, where the high productivity areas are placed on the east side of Scotland. Water although in excess in western parts of the country does not contribute into greater carbon or timber production as solar radiation (a key factor for productions) is also extremely limited. Also results of the project based on spatial analysis showed that Scots pine grows better in sandy regions where soils are not water logged. Winter values of maximum and minimum temperature have a greater effect on growth (both in terms of carbon and timber). Significant also appears to be the number of frost days during the winter months which could limit growth. Finally map overlay of model produced maps with maps from 1970’s showed that potential patterns of Scots pine productivity are explained by potential soil water availability with the waterlogged soils having restricting growth.

The potential of G.I.S. for research and forest management combined with process-based models is huge. When remote sensing comes also into alliance then the results is a more powerful tool for sustainable forest management decisions.

The future framework of any national forest service should be the introduction of a G.I.S. web-based tool utilizing spatially extended climatic and soil with remotely sensed inputs of leaf area index, providing simulations with process-based models and creating a database of potential scenarios based on management decisions. Model predictions should include both timber and carbon based predictions, which later should be capable for visualisation through a web-based G.I.S. version freely available to all managers for decision making.

The future of process-based models has two directions. First is the introduction of routines capable to predict regeneration of woodlands based on current environmental and soil conditions, and second the integration of the whole package into a web-based G.I.S. framework.

Because the key for a sustainable management decision for world’s forests is based on reliable and process-based information widely available by modern technologies.

————–

If you are interested to learn more about process-based models, 3-PGN, my spatial analysis with ArcInfo and the results of my project you could either visit my personal web-page at http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/s0199797 or email me at: G.Xenakis@sms.ed.ac.uk

Comments»

1. alok singh - September 6, 2006

hello
i am a research schlore ,and i desire to work on topic “carbon sequestration and its impact on ecosystem”
i want to take some image data untrepetation from sattlite imagery from satellite.
i want to calculate ” how much carbon sequestrate in per tree? and how i can calculate this ,
how the process based model can be helpfull in my research work for estimating the GIS .

i will wait for cooperation

alok singh
school of future studies and planning
DAVV indore .
india
(m) +91 9893120850

2. Georgios Xenakis - September 6, 2006

Hi Alok,

Thank you very much for your interest. The subject you are interested in is very brought. You should narrow it down a little bit and make more specific what you want to investigate using remote sensing and process-based models.

But to give you an idea of what you could possible do, you could utilize remote sensing data of NDVI with a process-based model to simulated what is the carbon sequestration in a large area (e.g. a forest complex or on a national scale). Process-based model will utilize the remotely sensed inputs you will give and provide you with estimation of ecosystem carbon pools. Then you could either validate the results with field measurements, or you could investigate what is the effect of a possible climate change scenario.

Something more you could possible do is to estimate carbon sequestration from a series of remote sensing over a period, scale it down to a single tree and then compare the results with an individual tree process-based model.

I hope that helped. All the best.
Georgios

3. jitendra dixit - June 12, 2008

hi,
i am a student of m.sc geoinformatics at iirs dehradun , india . and i desire to my research project on “carbon sequestration for geological model ( petrolium or coal ) using remote sensing .
because i m geoinformatics student so i m trying to develop some model , or can i also apply ur model in geological sites .

actually i want to find suitable geological sites for carban sequestration using remote sensing and gis , basically its fully application based but i want to incorprate geoinformatics in this. so i m little confuse .

can you guide me or give some suggestion on that topic.

4. Georgios Xenakis - June 16, 2008

Hi,

Unfortunately my model does not work for geological processes. I am talking about carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems (that is, trees and soils). I am sorry but I do not know much about models in geological processes. However, I do recommend to look at the literature. I am sure there are many models that will satisfy your modelling needs.

Regards,
Georgios

5. AVI - December 26, 2008

Dear sir,
we are working in carbon sequestration in forest area. our area is large scale and want to calculate carbon sequestrize area through GIS. HOW TO MEASURE AND WHAT TAKE MAJOR PARAMETERS FOR FOREST (TREE) MEASUREMENTS, PLEASE REPLY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
THANKING YOU

6. Georgios Xenakis - January 12, 2009

Hi,

Sorry for the late reply.

To calculate carbon sequestration for a large forest area first you need to know what is growing where. Which means you need a forest cover. Once you have that you will need to know how much is growing. That is, a map of either biomass (in terms of carbon per hectare) or if no such information available, then volume per hectare. Then you will need to use allometric equations which relate mean breast height diameter with biomass (above and below ground). You must have a mean diameter grid which if you don’t have from a forest survey you might have it from a stand volume map. Once you convert diameter to biomass then you have to subtract two periods. That is, you must have data lets say for 2008 and 2000. By subtracting the two you know how much biomass (tonned of dry matter per hectare) your forest has accumulated during the 8 year period. If you devide it by 8 you know the mean annual biomass growth of your forest. To convert dry mass to carbon unites you divide the results by 2 (that is, if 10 tDM/ha then you have 5 tC/ha). You must however be very carefull, because in this 8 year carbon growth you will have to add all the carbon removed from your forest by any thinning or felling operations. If you don’t have real data then you can assume a constant amount per year or a one-off removal.

You see that you need a set of data for your forests, which include forest-cover, mead diameter at breast-height for each species, allometric equation of above and below ground biomass for each of your species and an indication of thinnings and fellings. All of them can be spatially represented using the forest-cover map by assigning values for each species. Then all calculations can be done with map calculator.

This is the statistically based method. However, if you want to do it with a process-based model (i.e., photosynthesis, respiration etc) can become more complicated). There are also already developed statistical models for several forests that relate above ground carbon production with environmental and topographical variables, which means the only thing you have to do is to provide the input variables and run the calculation for your area.

The final and most recent progress is to use remote sensing satellite images to derive NDVI and from there calculate the photosynthetic capacity of your forest and the annual carbon sequestration.

If you need further explanations please contact me at georgios.xenakis@forestry.gsi.gov.uk

Regards,
Georgios

7. Avadhesh Kumar Koshal - January 24, 2009

Thanks sir for reply

8. Avadhesh Kumar Koshal - February 16, 2009

Dear sir,
I want to know allometric formula direct use in arc gis -9.3 or calculate separate in excel sheet than create map and give major general allometric formula which can use in tree measurment (if possible). Give me example base Brif methodology of change detection through GIS FOR TEMPORAL STUDY.

With regards
A.K. Koshal

9. Avadhesh Kumar Koshal - February 19, 2009

Dear sir
I am waiting for reply

with regards
AKKOSHAL

10. Georgios Xenakis - February 24, 2009

Hi,

Have a look at the literature and find allometric equations for your species. Otherwise, you will have to develop them from real data with non-linear regression. Then you just use map calculator using your diameter grid to predict biomass.

G.

11. Avadhesh Kumar Koshal - February 25, 2009

Thanks Sir

12. A.K.KOSHAL - March 5, 2009

Dear sir,
i created GIS layer (polygon) in arc gis software and link data sheet (excel file . dbf format) and analysis the data in geostatistical analysis tools. but i want to know which algorithem is better for calculate carbon sequestrize area like that kriging / cokriging / interpolation or other algorthim can be solved -
-distribution of forest sps. and qunatity wise.
-area calculation, how? through calculator.
- the given query based map will be accurate. or classified map which will be come automatic willl be accurate?
please give info about geostatistical method is good for anlysis of forest purpose if yes which function is good.
with regards
A.K.KOSHAL

13. A.K.KOSHAL - March 5, 2009

Dear sir,
Please give info as soon as possible. waiting for your reply.work is going on . your helps are very good for our project.
Thanking you
with regards
A.K.KOSHAL

14. A.K.KOSHAL - March 17, 2009

sir, wating for your reply

15. Sanjay Gairola - March 25, 2009

Sir
my research area is forest ecology and conservation biology. The research activity presently i am involved-in is ecological risk assessment in mountains. I am looking for developing ecosystem integrity indices/ profiles for ecological risk assessment in mountains in Indian Himalaya. I am taking into account all ecological, physical and socio-economic factors into consideration which have direct bearing on integrity of mountain ecosystems. The main attributes of ecosystems including health, resilience, stability, succession, productivity and sustainability will be taken into accoount for selected watershed in the region. The use of RS/GIS will be used for change detection analysis and integrating proces-based models as well as productivity of ecosystems.
I would be higly grateful to you if guide me in this direction. Like what type of model are impotatnt in this regards. And particularly integrating the all three, ecological, physical and soci-economic attributes for developing integrity profile for a particular ecosystem, so that resource manages and policymakers could be informed for better management.
I hope your valuable suggestion will be of immense importance to me in this reserahc programme.

with high regards

Sincerely
Sanjay Gairola

16. A.K.KOSHAL - March 31, 2009

sir, long time not given any response . I am waiting for your reply.
Thanks

17. koshal ak - April 18, 2009

sir you not giving any respons.wating u for answer

18. nihan yıldız - April 23, 2009

I send you email but it couldnt delivery:

please contact with me

Hi Mr. Georgios Xenakis

I am Enviromental Engineer, my name is Nihan YILDIZ, from Turkey. Now I am in a master programme, and one of my lecture is enviromental modelling. My presentation topic is modelling ecology of plants in that lecture. While I was searcing on the net, I met with your research, and read this “If you are interested to learn more about the model or to have access to either excel, C++ or Simile version of the model please do not hesitate to contact me ”

So, I am contacting with you, I want to show visual tools while my presentation, if you send me your research process-based model 3-PG, in C++ and excel format.

Thanks your attention already now.

Nihan YILDIZ
Enviromental Engineer
Master Degree Student at Fatih University, Istanbul

19. Georgios Xenakis - April 23, 2009

Reply to: A.K.KOSHAL

There is no bad or good interpolation algorithm. Depends on the data you have and which gives the best precision. I suggest you look the literature. There are plenty of publications dealing with the subject. I suggest either Web of Science database or CAB abstracts

20. koshal ak - April 24, 2009

thanks sir for suggestion

21. Christoph - August 27, 2010

Dear Dr Xenakis

I enjoyed reading your post. I’m conducting a study on climate change impact on plantation forestry in the tropics. I want to compare the performance of several genotype and see which one is likely to perform best under changed conditions.
After using a multiple regression model I’m now considering to use a process based model like the spatial version of 3-PG. I’m not sure if this allows me to calibrate the model to the different genotypes/provenances of the same species.
For a quick response I would be grateful. Thanks a lot in advance.
Christoph Leibing (PhD candidate)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.